That opinion is based on the story of how he thinks the majority on the one hand, how the other thinks the minority and what is the government doing?
That means you may be taking views from interested and part three truths?
And this is the role of information, which is to tell what aseptically propinano the powerful, the only right-of-forum?
In this manner, and information should be increased to overlook the fact, not to analyze it and ultimately transmits the public interpretation of reality filtered by the interests of the majority, the minority and the government.
So the only public opinion that can be formed that is spoken by the powers that be: paradoxically, we tend to have a single thought in the name of pluralism and neutrality of information!
overall result is the approval of the proposals of existence of the adverse socio-political el'avanzante disappearance of a vision of life alternative to that, in turn, now common, majority and opposition, long united by a kind of embrace media based on fuzzy models and shared.
seems to me that this is so, but we should hear other bells ....
Andrea Volpe
